Grant Application Guidelines





Foundation Mission Statement
The mission of the NCMA Education and Research Foundation is to advance and support the concrete masonry industry and the public interest through research and education programs designed to meet the future needs of the industry. This will be accomplished through the following initiatives:

  • Workforce Development -- supporting programs to insure an adequate supply of a well-trained workforce for the future growth of the concrete masonry industry;
  • Codes and Standards Research -- supporting industry research and technical studies for codes and standards; and
  • Architectural and Engineering Student Curriculum -- supporting programs that educate the public, members of the industry, and architectural and engineering students and professors.

Working cooperatively with other organizations and educational institutions, the foundation will fund multi-faceted education and research programs. The foundation will function as a resource development and grant-making organization and not an implementing one.

Eligibility
The foundation welcomes proposals from all qualified scientists, engineers, educators and other professionals associated with the concrete masonry industry. Generally, proposals initiated by an individual are officially submitted by their employing organization. Graduate students are not encouraged to submit research proposals, but should arrange to serve as research assistants to faculty members.

No person on the grounds of race, color, age, sex, national origin, or disability shall be denied the benefits of financial assistance from the foundation.

Ineligibility

  1. Organizations whose chief purpose is to influence legislation or to participate or intervene in political campaigns on behalf of or against any candidate for public office;
  2. Endowments or memorials;
  3. Religious, veteran or fraternal organizations unless they are engaged in a significant project with national or regional benefit;
  4. Construction or renovation projects;
  5. Fund-raising events; and
  6. Proprietary projects or products not in concert with the mission of the foundation as determined by the board of trustees.

When To Submit A Request
The foundation accepts requests at any time.

Required Information
All grant requests must include the following information:

  1. Project description;
  2. Project objective;
  3. Background information (what has been done in this area and why this work is unique);
  4. Scope of project to include what work is included in the project and what are the deliverables (report, video, presentation, etc);
  5. Summary of qualifications to include who will perform the work and how does their background qualify them for this task;
  6. Anticipated impact on a national level, regional level, and local level;
  7. Budget to include anticipated expenses;
  8. Requested payment procedure (start-up funds, one lump sum payment or several payments with last payment at completion of project);
  9. List of other funding sources specifying amounts, matching funds, etc.; and
  10. Reporting schedule: How will the ongoing progress of the project be reported? What is the time frame for project completion?

Approval Preferences
Preference will be given for requests that provide national benefit first and regional benefit second; utilize funding partnerships with local and/or state groups and/or other national and international groups; utilize partnerships with other industries impacted by the results; and/or utilize matching funds arrangements.

Review Process
It is the intent of the foundation board of trustees that all requests for funding, financial support or grants follow a formal process of review.

  1. For additional information or to submit a funding request:

    NCMA Education & Research Foundation
    13750 Sunrise Valley Drive
    Herndon, VA 20171
    877.343.6268 Toll-free
    703.713.1910 Fax

    foundation@ncma.org

  2. All requests are reviewed by the executive administrator to insure that the required information has been provided to include completion of the cover sheet. Additional information may be requested from the petitioner and/or other professionals.
  3. Following a 30-day review period, all requests are forwarded to members of the Program Review Committee for consideration at its next meeting. Meetings are generally held in the first and third quarter of each year at the NCMA annual convention and midyear meeting respectively; however, if the submission is time-sensitive, the Program Review Committee may convene via conference call to rule on an application.
  4. The Program Review Committee will review all requests, evaluating the relevance to the foundation’s mission statement and initiatives as established by the membership. Members of the Program Review Committee may request additional information from the requestor and/or other professionals with expertise in the project area.
  5. The Program Review Committee will submit its recommendation for funding to the foundation board of trustees.
  6. The board of trustees will rule on the committee’s recommendation at the next meeting. Meetings are generally held in the first and third quarter of each year at the NCMA annual convention and midyear meeting respectively; however, if the submission is time-sensitive, the board of trustees may convene via conference call to rule on an application.
  7. All funding requestors will receive notice of the final decision by the executive administrator in writing.

Grant Follow-Up Requirements

  1. If no progress on an approved project occurs within six months following the date of funding approval by the board of trustees, the grant may be rescinded;
  2. Progress reports will be required on a regular basis; and
  3. Failure to submit progress reports at requested intervals could result in payment delays.

Questions Frequently Asked by the Program Review Committee

  1. Does the project address a major challenge facing the industry?
  2. Are the goals and objectives and the plans and procedures for achieving them, well-developed, worthwhile and realistic?
  3. Is the project informed by research in teaching and learning, current issues, what others have done, and relevant literature?
  4. Does the project have the potential to provide fundamental improvements in teaching and/or learning through effective uses of technology?
  5. Is the project led by and supported by the involvement of capable, trained professionals who have recent and relevant experience?
  6. Is the project supported by adequate facilities and resources and by an institutional and department commitment?
  7. What are the broader impacts of the proposed outcomes?
  8. To what extent will the results of the project contribute to the improvement of the industry as a whole?
  9. Are the plans for evaluation of the project appropriate and adequate?
  10. Are the results of the project likely to be useful nation-wide?
  11. Is all budget information included? Is it complete and unambiguous?
  12. Is the cost of the project realistic?
  13. How will the progress of the project be measured and reported?
  14. How will the requested funds be needed, i.e., will start-up funds be needed; how are payments requested?